Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) ; 14(4):1433-1440, 2023.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2321717

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes in patients with no prior history of the disease. In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the association between COVID-19 and newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes and identify the potential risk factors and underlying mechanisms of diabetes development in COVID-19 patients. Investigating the occurrence of diabetes following coronavirus infection was the study's goal. Out of the total 2700 cases, the mildly symptomatic (1628, 60.30%) and moderately symptomatic (815, 30.18%) patients received OPD treatment and experienced alleviation in 3-7 days;none of them required hospitalisation. Out of 2700 cases, 257 (or 9.52%) required hospitalisation due to serious illness. Our analysis shows that COVID-19 is associated with a higher risk of newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes, and that factors such as inflammation, insulin resistance, and genetic predisposition may contribute to the development of diabetes in COVID-19 patients. This study confirms the necessity of active glucose monitoring in hospitalised, critically unwell SARS-CoV-19-infected patients. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

2.
International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism ; 27(3):100-101, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2249197

ABSTRACT

Background: An important prognostic factor in any form of infection seems to be glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, we examined the effects of optimal glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus and affected by COVID-19. Interplay between severities of COVID-19 in earliest data on the pandemic. Relative risks of death 1.7 to 2.2 based on studies from China and Italy. People with diabetes appear to be at greater risk of severe disease. 31% mortality in Wuhan vs 14% hospitalized non DM. Most endemic related to T2DM rather than T1DM. Obesity and insulin resistance may be particular risk factors. Similar finding with previous SARS coronavirus outbreaks. (Ref, Wu, Jama 2020 Graselli Jama 2020 Zhon). Further study from France Coranado study including 1317 people with diabetes mellitus and COVID-19 in 53 hospitals, 88% with T2DM, 3% new diagnosis, mean BMI 28 kg/m2, HBA1c 65 mmol/mol. Primary endpoint death or ventilation at day 7. 410 required Intensive care unit admissions, 267 ventilated, 140 deaths and 237 patient discharged by day 7. Comprehensive dataset from UK comparing primary care and national diabetes audited data reported 33% of in hospital death related to COVID-19 occurred in people with diabetes (31.3% T2DM, 1.5% for type 1 diabetes). 5.1% of total individual population had diabetes. Adjusted relative risk of death of death 2.9% for type 1 diabetes, 1.8% for type 2 diabetes. It was also noted there is clear association between renal function and outcome with increased mortality with e GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Further data from the United States the authors further compared the outcome for those with hyperglycemia with those with normoglycemia at admission. 41% had poor outcome in those with hyperglycemia without known diabetes vs under 15% in context of COVID-19 for those with previous diabetes. Marked hyperglycemia at admission had strong impact on prognosis and the development of diabetes mellitus in context of COVID-19 is particular serious events. (Bode et al, J Diab Sci Tech, 2020). These worked was also identified a significant increase in total death in diabetes during 2020. Objective(s): To evaluate the effect of optimal glycemic control on the outcome for patients with type 2 diabetes affected by COVID- 19 infection. Method(s): This is a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were affected by moderate disease of COVID-19 infection and admitted to Fujairah hospital (UAE), compared with 100 non diabetic patient admitted to the same hospital, with the same severity of COVID-19 disease. Result(s): Out of 200 patients studied, 100 patients were non-diabetic and 100 patients were having diabetes mellitus. In the diabetic group, all patients were diagnosed to have diabetes already before admission, and these 100 (100%) were treated with insulin infusion or basal -bolus regime. At baseline, D-dimer levels were not significantly higher in the diabetic group (mean D-dimer = 1.327) than in the normoglycemic group (mean of D-dimer = 1.544) (P < 0.001). Even though all patients were on standard treatment for COVID-19 infection, IL-6 and D-dimer levels persisted higher in patients with diabetes mellitus during hospitalization. Patients with diabetes had a higher risk of severe disease and prolonged length of stay and death 7% deceased (n=7), than those without diabetes and with normoglycemia.5% (n=5) deceased with length of stay of 13.7 days for diabetic group and 12.6 days for non-diabetic group. It was shown in our study, that there are contributory factors like hypertension which was found in 42% of our diabetic patients, and obesity that affect 34% of the same group, ischemic heart disease in three patients, could potentially contributed to the poor outcome and death. We looked to the effect of ethnicity in our patients outcome, the Emirati nationals contributed 14.29% (26) of the cohort, while 13.19% (n=24) were other Arab nationalities and 72.53% (n=132) were South-Asian (chart 5), it clearly showed those people of South-Asian background with high ctopic lipid and increased insulin resistance had worse outcome. Conclusion(s): Insulin infusion and basal/bolus regime was an effective method for achieving glycemic targets and improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and it was showed effect in reducing the rate of admission to an ICU, the use of mechanical ventilation and prevent death. Immediate evidence from our study, that COVID-19 was associated with particular challenges in diabetes management. High rate of ketosis and acidosis in people with type 2 diabetes (not normally, ketosis prone), extreme level of hyperglycemia and associated hyperosmolar. Associated with significant acute kidney injury in some cases. Extreme insulin resistance with very high insulin requirement. Many cases of new onset diabetes mellitus mostly required insulin. Some unusual biochemical features, marked fall in serum albumin, variable CRP, Ferritin response, raised D-dimer and high rate of thromboembolic complications. It was shown in our study, that there are contributory factors like hypertension, obesity, ischemic heart disease and presence of acute kidney injury, were potentially contributed to the poor outcome and death.

3.
The Journal for Nurse Practitioners ; 19(3), 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2247492

ABSTRACT

New-onset type 1 diabetes most frequently presents with diabetic ketoacidosis in young patients. A subset of patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes may present with a slower progression to insulin deficiency and are frequently misdiagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Clinicians should screen for type 1 diabetes in patients who present with hyperglycemia and do not have obvious signs of insulin resistance or obesity. This case report presents an adult patient with hyperglycemia after a hospital admission for coronavirus disease 2019 and the evidence used to diagnose type 1 diabetes with atypical presentation.

4.
Cureus ; 15(2): e34956, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258809

ABSTRACT

On March 2, 2020, the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was dedicated in Saudi Arabia. The government established partial quarantine, and all precautions were mandatory on March 23, 2020. This in turn forced people to spend more time at home, leading to changes in the physical activity and dietary habits of individuals. In this study, we aimed to assess the behavioral changes of Saudi diabetic individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic and measure the effectiveness of the behavioral changes of Saudi diabetic individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic on the control of the glucose level. A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online questionnaire sent to diabetic patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Participants ranging from 18 years old and above of both genders were selected. Diabetic patients (type 1 and 2) were included. All collected data for this study were analyzed using Stata 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). A total of 223 people responded. For 45% of individuals, doctor visits significantly decreased (p<0.05), and the percentage of doctor visits also decreased for individuals who previously visited their doctor more regularly. Furthermore, the number of hours spent on tablets increased significantly during COVID-19 (p<0.05). Our findings demonstrate that there are no significant changes in lifestyle factors or glycemic control during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic year in individuals with diabetes. However, the rate of patient visits to the doctor was lower than pre-pandemic, with an increase in the rate of physical activity.

5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 156, 2023 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In preparation of future pandemics, it is important to recognise population-level determinants associated with development of severe illness before efficient vaccines and evidence-based therapeutic measures are available. The aim of this study was to identify pre-pandemic diagnoses recorded in a middle-aged and elderly population that were associated with development of severe COVID-19 during the first pandemic year. METHODS: A cohort study design was used. Severe COVID-19 was defined as a course of illness that resulted in hospital admission or death. A retrospective analysis was performed that comprised all individuals aged 39 years and older (N = 189,951) living in Jönköping County, Sweden. All diagnosed morbidity recorded in contacts with health care during the pre-pandemic year 2019 was used to identify which diagnoses that were associated with development of severe COVID-19 in the first pandemic year 2020. The analyses were performed separately for each diagnosis using binary logistic regression with adjustment for sex and age. RESULTS: Severe COVID-19 was suffered by 0.67% (N = 1,280) of the middle-aged and elderly population in the first pandemic year. Individuals previously diagnosed with dementia, cerebral palsy, kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity were at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19. For patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, the odds ratio (OR) was 2.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.92-2.48). Type 1 diabetes mellitus was not associated with increased risk. CONCLUSION: Diagnoses suggesting service provision at long-term healthcare facilities and co-morbidity with components of the metabolic syndrome were associated with an increased risk of developing severe COVID-19 in a middle-aged and elderly population before vaccines were available.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Vaccines , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Pandemics , Cohort Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Risk Factors
6.
Nutrients ; 15(4)2023 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233916

ABSTRACT

The general lockdown decreed in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the ALAS health promotion intervention aimed at the population at high risk of suffering from type 2 diabetes. We conducted a descriptive study in 2020 through a telephone survey and a comparison with baseline data to determine the impact of confinement on the lifestyles of the participants. We collected sociodemographic variables and conducted assessments before/after confinement on general health status and lifestyle (sleep, physical activity and diet). Additionally, weight, BMI and adherence to a Mediterranean diet were assessed. Descriptive statistical analyses, comparisons of pre-post confinement data and logistic regression were carried out. A total of 387 individuals responded. Among them, 31.8% reported a worse perception of health after confinement, and 63,1% reported no change. Regarding exercise, 61.1% reduced their weekly physical activity time. Regarding diet, 34,4% perceived worse quality, and 53.4% reported no change, despite the fact that 89.4% declared changes in their eating practices. Weight and BMI decreased by 3,1%, and adherence to the Mediterranean diet improved from baseline. Confinement had a negative impact on the general health, diet, sleep and physical activity of this population (at risk of diabetes); however, weight and BMI decreased, and adherence to a Mediterranean diet improved.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diet, Mediterranean , Humans , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Communicable Disease Control , Feeding Behavior , Life Style , Habits
7.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30287, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2145089

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome­coronavirus­2 (SARS­CoV­2), responsible for COVID-19, is mainly a respiratory illness, but it can affect other organs also such as heart, kidneys, and liver. Myocardial injury from COVID-19 has been reported in hospitalized patients ranging from pericarditis and myocarditis to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). COVID-19 is highly hypercoagulable state and is associated with both central and peripheral thromboembolism. COVID 19 patients with ACS may not present with classical features of chest pain and electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most important initial investigation in these patients to assess for any ST or T waves changes. COVID-19 patients with cardiac involvement are the most vulnerable group of patients and have increased morbidity and mortality risk. COVID-19 infections can affect the cardiovascular system in patients with or without history of coronary artery disease (CAD), but the risk of type 1 or 2 myocardial infarction (MI), myocardial injury, ST segment elevation, myocarditis, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and life threatening arrhythmias are more common in the former group. We present a case of 55-year-old patient who presented to our cardiac center with ST elevated myocardial infarction and high blood sugar level. Patient was recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but was not commenced on medications. Echocardiogram showed mildly impaired left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) with inferior wall hypokinesia, and ECG showed inferior leads ST elevation. Coronary angiogram showed severe mid-vessel lesion and occluded posterior left ventricular branch (PLV). Multiple attempts at aspirating the thrombus resulted in thrombolysis in MI grade 2 (TIMI 2) flow in the vessel and patient was commenced on a tirofiban infusion for 72 hours.

8.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(23)2022 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2143145

ABSTRACT

The global pandemic of the novel Coronavirus infection 2019 (COVID-19) challenged the care of comorbid patients. The risk imposed by COVID-19 on diabetes patients is multisystemic, exponential, and involves glucose dysregulation. The increased burden for diabetes patients infected with COVID-19 is substantial in countries with a high prevalence of diabetics, such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aims to explore the prevalence of diabetes, clinical characteristic, and outcomes of patients admitted for COVID-19 treatment with or without a concurrent preadmission diagnosis of diabetes. A prospective study was performed on 1199 adults admitted with confirmed COVID-19 from December 2020 to April 2021 to a single hospital in the UAE. The study compared the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in COVID-19-infected patients with diabetes to patients without diabetes. The study endpoints include the development of new-onset diabetes, admission to ICU, trends in the blood glucose levels, and death. A total of 1199 patients (390 with diabetes) were included in the study. A diabetes prevalence was detected among 9.8% of the study population. Among the diabetes group, 10.8% were morbidly obese, 65.4% had associated hypertension, and 18.9% had coronary artery disease. Diabetes patients showed higher rates of ICU admission (11.1% vs. 7.1%), NIV requirement (9.6% vs. 6.4%), and intubation (5.45% vs. 2%) compared to the non-diabetes group. Advanced age was a predictor of a worsening COVID-19 course, while diabetes (p < 0.050) and hypertension (p < 0.025) were significant predictors of death from COVID-19. Nearly three-fourths (284 (73.4%)) of the diabetic patients developed worsened hyperglycemia as compared to one-fifth (171 (20.9%)) of the nondiabetic patients. New-onset diabetes was detected in 9.8% of COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 severity is higher in the presence of diabetes and is associated with worsening hyperglycemia and poor clinical outcomes. Preexisting hypertension is a predictor of COVID-19 severity and death.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperglycemia , Hypertension , Obesity, Morbid , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Case Management , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Risk Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology
9.
Cureus ; 14(9): e28830, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2100363

ABSTRACT

Studies show a low progression rate of prediabetes to Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) that we commonly seek to reverse, but we don't associate prediabetes as a lead-up to the first presentation of ketosis. We present a prediabetic who, in less than a year, converted to GAD65 antibody-positive diabetes mellitus with a diabetic ketoacidosis presentation. A 69-year-old male presented with three weeks of fatigue, polyuria, polydipsia, abdominal pain, and weight loss. Vital signs and physical exam were normal except for abdominal tenderness and dry oral mucosa. Complete blood count (CBC) was normal; blood glucose was severely elevated with mild corrected hyponatremia; elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis with glucosuria and ketonuria. He received an insulin drip, normal saline, and potassium in the intensive care unit. His anion gap closed overnight and was switched to basal-bolus insulin. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) came out to be higher than expected as compared to last year of low prediabetic value, decreased c-peptide levels, and positive anti-GAD65 antibody. His first abnormal HbA1c was 5.8% a year ago and no autoimmune marker was checked before. He was vaccinated with the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine a year ago with an mRNA vaccine booster two months earlier. He was not COVID-19 infected. We discharged him with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Type I DM passes from autoimmunity-positive normoglycemia to dysglycemia to the symptomatic stage, typically progressing more rapidly in children than in older adults. A new Type I or dysglycemia in Type II DM is increasingly reported after COVID-19 vaccines/infection. Mechanisms could be cytokine-mediated beta-cell damage or autoimmunity after mRNA vaccines or as a part of autoimmune syndrome induced by vaccine adjuvants. This case reports the rapid progression of prediabetes to Type 1 rather than Type 2 DM and highlights the possibility of dysglycemia after COVID-19 vaccines and calls for measures to prevent or early management of these side effects.

10.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29135, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2072192

ABSTRACT

Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), presents multiple, diverse challenges to providing appropriate medical care, especially in terms of medication and treatment adherence for chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these barriers by potentially forcing physicians to modify their treatment plans due to limitations on in-person visits and changes to patients' financial and social support systems. It remains uncertain whether physicians believe they can provide the same standard of care using telehealth technology or other means to their patients during the pandemic. The goal of this study was to explore physician perceptions about their ability to provide care to patients with T2DM during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology This cross-sectional study collected data between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021, using an anonymous, self-administered online survey involving DO and MD physicians including residents treating patients with T2DM. The survey was administered via REDCap and collected data on participant demographics, attitudes, perceptions, knowledge, and prior and current (COVID-19-era) experience with care for T2DM patients. Physicians registered with the Florida Department of Health with publicly available emails were invited to participate. Results The survey showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, 57.9% of physicians (n=48) believed that their patients have a weaker social support system; 68.7% (n=57) modified their patient care plans due to patients' financial difficulties; 78.4% (n=65) believed a regular physical exam is necessary to properly treat patients; 48.2% (n=40) did not believe they had a more complete picture of the case with remote consultations; 47.0% (n=39) were not as satisfied with remote consultations as with face-to-face patient visits; 68.7% (n=57) believed telehealth is necessary to adequately treat patients; 38.5% (n=32) have been less likely to refer their patients to other providers or specialists; 45.8% (n=38) reported concerns over admitting their patients to the hospital for acute medical care; 61.5% (n=51) reported having more patients delay scheduling their routine follow-up care; 61.5% (n=51) believed their patients have been less compliant with the healthcare plans recommended to them. Conclusions The study showed that COVID-19 has significantly impacted physicians' perceptions and abilities to provide care for patients with T2DM. COVID-19 has negatively impacted several crucial aspects of diabetes management, including consistent in-person examinations, social support, and referral to other required services, which could result in long-term consequences for these patients. Furthermore, our study suggests that physicians may not be as satisfied with the care they are able to provide via remote consultations as they are with in-person visits, which has significant implications as we move toward a more telehealth-driven healthcare delivery system.

11.
Cureus ; 14(5): e24986, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1897123

ABSTRACT

In a fast-evolving COVID-19 pandemic, co-infection with mucormycosis has been reported in some parts of the world. It is still unknown whether one of the either diseases makes the patient susceptible to developing the other. The co-occurrence of them significantly elevates the mortality risk and is commonly reported in immunocompromised individuals. We herein report a case of COVID-19 infection with rhinocerebral mucormycosis without prior steroid use or underlying immunosuppressive diseases.

12.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(8)2022 04 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1809849

ABSTRACT

With the growing prevalence and complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, many patients fail to achieve treatment goals despite guidelines and possibilities for treatment individualization. One of the identified root causes of this failure is clinical inertia. We explored this phenomenon, its possible predictors, and groups of patients affected the most, together with offering potential paths for intervention. Our research was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2021 involving 52 physicians and 543 patients of primary healthcare institutions in Belgrade, Serbia. The research instruments were questionnaires based on similar studies, used to collect information related to the factors that contribute to developing clinical inertia originating in both physicians and patients. In 224 patients (41.3%), clinical inertia was identified in patients with poor overall health condition, long diabetes duration, and comorbidities. Studying the changes made to the treatment, most patients (53%) had their treatment adjustment more than a year ago, with 19.3% of patients changing over the previous six months. Moreover, we found significant inertia in the treatment of patients using modern insulin analogues. Referral to secondary healthcare institutions reduced the emergence of inertia. This assessment of primary care physicians and their patients pointed to the high presence of clinical inertia, with an overall health condition, comorbidities, diabetes duration, current treatment, last treatment change, glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting glucose measuring frequency, BMI, patient referral, diet adjustment, and physician education being significant predictors.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Physicians, Primary Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use
13.
Cureus ; 14(1): e21203, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1702760

ABSTRACT

Mucormycosis is a devastating fungal infection seen in patients who are immunosuppressed or in severe inflammatory states. Mucormycosis has been increasingly seen in the setting of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. We describe a 68-year-old male with a past medical history of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus who presented with acute vision loss and was found to have concomitant diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on presentation. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis was suspected given the patient's presentation and was confirmed with an ethmoidal sinus biopsy. Our case was further complicated by the presence of cavernous sinus thrombosis, cerebral infarcts, and, later, the development of a left orbital hematoma following therapeutic anticoagulation. This case report aims to address the rare but now increasing incidence of rhinocerebral mucormycosis in the setting of COVID-19, further complicated by DKA, cerebral thrombosis, and intraorbital hematoma.

14.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(12)2021 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1591863

ABSTRACT

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is a complex disease associated with chronic inflammation, end-organ damage, and multiple comorbidities. Initiatives are emerging for a more personalized approach in managing DM2 patients. We hypothesized that by clustering inflammatory markers with variables indicating the sociodemographic and clinical contexts of patients with DM2, we could gain insights into the hidden phenotypes and the underlying pathophysiological backgrounds thereof. We applied the k-means algorithm and a total of 30 variables in a group of 174 primary care (PC) patients with DM2 aged 50 years and above and of both genders. We included some emerging markers of inflammation, specifically, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the cytokines IL-17A and IL-37. Multiple regression models were used to assess associations of inflammatory markers with other variables. Overall, we observed that the cytokines were more variable than the marker NLR. The set of inflammatory markers was needed to indicate the capacity of patients in the clusters for inflammatory cell recruitment from the circulation to the tissues, and subsequently for the progression of end-organ damage and vascular complications. The hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid hormonal axis, in addition to the cytokine IL-37, may have a suppressive, inflammation-regulatory role. These results can help PC physicians with their clinical reasoning by reducing the complexity of diabetic patients.

15.
Cureus ; 13(9): e17879, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1438883

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Initially, it was reported in December 2019 and became a global pandemic in March 2020, with many presentations and after-effects. We report the case of a 68-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency room with the chief complaint of a skin rash and itching all over her body, developing within a few minutes of insulin injection. The patient had tested positive for COVID-19 almost eight days ago and was self-quarantined. She was a known diabetic for the past 28 years. Her blood glucose levels were maintained within the normal range by a combination regimen of oral anti-diabetic drugs and subcutaneous humulin 70/30 (70% neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and 30% regular human insulin) injections. After careful examination and thorough history taking, a newly acquired insulin allergy was diagnosed in the patient, attributed to her disrupted immune system due to the recent COVID-19 infection.

16.
Cureus ; 13(1): e13000, 2021 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:  To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) -- a single center tertiary hospital experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  A retrospective study was conducted among patients admitted to our hospital in the United States between March 1st and June 15th, 2020 with DKA and severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection known as COVID-19. We compared the baseline characteristics, laboratory data, and clinical course between survivors and nonsurvivors to identify the risk factors associated with mortality in the patients with DKA. RESULTS:  A total number of 43 patients were included in this study. The median age was 52 years. Thirty-three (76.7%) patients were male. Median value of initial glucose on presentation was 553 mg/dL (300.0-1927.0 mg/dL). On admission, 33 (76.7%) patients had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8% (64 mmol/mol) and HbA1c was not obtained in 10 (23.3%) patients. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was seen in 37 (86.0%) patients, 6 (14%) patients required renal replacement therapy and 22 (51.2%) required mechanical ventilation. Among the 43 patients, 25 (58.1%) died. Out of 25 patients who died 15 (60.0%) were Hispanics, 6 (24.0%) were White, 3 (12.0%) were African American, 1 (4%) was Arabic, and 1 (4%) was Asian. The patients who died were older in age than who survived (mean age 58 ± 6.13 vs 46 ± 9.39; p = 0.023). Some 95% of the patients requiring mechanical ventilation died (odds ratio [OR]: 89.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.10-874.96); p = 0.001). Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors had significantly higher d-dimer (13.00 ± 3.20 mcg/mL vs 6.15 ± 3.66 mcg/mL; p< 0.006) and peak ferritin values (2763.66 ± 1105.32 ng/mL vs 835.16 ± 257.07 ng/mL; p= 0.016).  Conclusion: Our retrospective study shows COVID-19 infection may present as DKA in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Older age, mechanical ventilation, elevated d-dimer, and ferritin are associated with poor prognosis in these patients. Our study shows that COVID-19 is associated with substantial mortality in DKA patients and adds to the limited literature available regarding poor risk factors associated with mortality in these patients.

17.
Clin Case Rep ; 9(1): 395-398, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-938403

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 in the setting of SGLT2 inhibitor use may precipitate euglycemic DKA separate from known acute viral illness and dehydration precipitants. There should be consideration of proactive discontinuation of these medications in these patients.

18.
Cureus ; 12(10): e10779, 2020 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-869282

ABSTRACT

Diabetic ketoacidosis is typically associated with type I diabetes mellitus, but it can be associated with type II diabetes mellitus under the conditions of extreme stress or as a presenting manifestation of ketosis-prone type II diabetes mellitus. A 38-year-old prediabetic male presented to the emergency room with hyperglycemia six weeks after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Laboratory results showed severe hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, positive ketones in urine and blood, and elevated fasting C- peptide level. COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was negative, and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were positive. The workup was completely unremarkable for acute infection. Hemoglobin A1C increased from 6.1% to 10.8% within six weeks. The mechanism by which COVID-19 infection may trigger the onset of full-blown diabetes mellitus remains unknown. Viral infection may cause the direct destruction of pancreatic beta cells or trigger the changes in the body that induce the state of insulin resistance. Antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may cross-react or interfere with the functioning of endogenous insulin. The association between type II diabetes and COVID-19 infections needs additional investigations to ascertain the exact mechanism by which COVID-19 infection triggers the onset of full-blown diabetes mellitus.

19.
Cureus ; 12(8): e9731, 2020 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-782443

ABSTRACT

The occurrence of diabetes is increasing globally and carries a variety of complications, such as thromboembolism, acute cerebrovascular accidents, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Although DKA is not commonly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), it can manifest in patients who have underlying comorbidities predisposed to DKA. Since the emergence of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, we have seen many cases and studies on the underlying pathophysiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia with or without respiratory failure. We have also learned that the angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor is one of the major entry sites of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it might be one of the causes that predispose patients to DKA. However, few studies exist that explore the development of DKA in T2D with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We present two cases of patients with DKA and COVID-19 treated with an insulin regimen with no further complications.

20.
Cureus ; 12(7): e8965, 2020 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-696520

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the risk factors associated with severe illness in COVID-19 leading to increased hospital admissions and mortality. COVID-19 can precipitate hyperglycemic emergencies like diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) in patients with DM. We present a case of a patient with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital with combined DKA and HHS. The case highlights the challenge of managing patients with DM suffering from COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL